<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>iPhone, Android, mobile, Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome OS to get Native Applications [Chromoting]</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-12623</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrome OS to get Native Applications [Chromoting]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-12623</guid>
		<description>[...] As we know, Chrome OS is essentially Google&#8217;s Chrome web browser running atop a Goobuntu flavor of Linux (Ubuntu). It will not run local applications other than the browser itself. All other apps will be accessed inside the browser. Of course having a browser optimized from kernel level will give out exceptional performance.   Read more: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we know, Chrome OS is essentially Google&#8217;s Chrome web browser running atop a Goobuntu flavor of Linux (Ubuntu). It will not run local applications other than the browser itself. All other apps will be accessed inside the browser. Of course having a browser optimized from kernel level will give out exceptional performance.   Read more: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome OS Event</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-6564</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome OS Event</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-6564</guid>
		<description>[...] Since few days, Google had been planning to release at least part of Chrome OS this week. That still may be the case at this event, but it looks for now that the more complete launch will in fact take place next year. And if they are holding this event now with a “complete overview,” progress is clearly being made, so you can probably expect that launch to be early next year.   Google first announced Chrome OS in July, but gave very few details about it. It seemed the idea there was more to drop a nuclear bomb on Microsoft, which was just about to announce its online free version of Office. In the subsequent months, interest has remained high for Chrome OS, but about all we’ve seen is what the OS’s browser may look like. Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since few days, Google had been planning to release at least part of Chrome OS this week. That still may be the case at this event, but it looks for now that the more complete launch will in fact take place next year. And if they are holding this event now with a “complete overview,” progress is clearly being made, so you can probably expect that launch to be early next year.   Google first announced Chrome OS in July, but gave very few details about it. It seemed the idea there was more to drop a nuclear bomb on Microsoft, which was just about to announce its online free version of Office. In the subsequent months, interest has remained high for Chrome OS, but about all we’ve seen is what the OS’s browser may look like. Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nvidia steps into Netbooks with it&#8217;s Tegra Platform - Chrome OS? &#124; Taranfx: Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2998</link>
		<dc:creator>Nvidia steps into Netbooks with it&#8217;s Tegra Platform - Chrome OS? &#124; Taranfx: Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2998</guid>
		<description>[...] as per the Facts we know about Chrome OS, we don&#8217;t know if there be any support for ARM, specially Tegra ARM. But I heard that Nvidia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as per the Facts we know about Chrome OS, we don&#8217;t know if there be any support for ARM, specially Tegra ARM. But I heard that Nvidia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Snyder</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>I must rebut some of your points on irrelevance.

2. It&#039;s not too late for Google to enter the OS market. Google is a lot like Apple, they don&#039;t invent things, they &quot;perfect&quot; things.  Google did not invent search or email, but they took those to the next level after the markets were quite mature.

3. Google has amazing experience making OS. They&#039;ve built very complex data storage systems to be infinitely scalable and triple redundant. Here is a white paper on the file system component of their storage systems: http://labs.google.com/papers/gfs.html . They must have done some Linux development to get the storage systems so mature. And don&#039;t forget about Android.

4. Google may be targeting netbooks, but look at the larger picture. It seems their long-term goal is really cloud computing. As you mention, Google will encourage and develop the cloud concept, but I think they have much bigger plans for cloud computing. And Netbooks are just a foot in the door--what better way to sell storing data off the computer than on a cheap and puny computer that holds non-professional data and is not designed to be a long-term computer.

Google has an amazing long-term vision and I have a feeling that Chrome OS is not an end in itself, but a vehicle to take their business models to the next level. Google holds a lot of cards it hasn&#039;t revealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must rebut some of your points on irrelevance.</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s not too late for Google to enter the OS market. Google is a lot like Apple, they don&#8217;t invent things, they &#8220;perfect&#8221; things.  Google did not invent search or email, but they took those to the next level after the markets were quite mature.</p>
<p>3. Google has amazing experience making OS. They&#8217;ve built very complex data storage systems to be infinitely scalable and triple redundant. Here is a white paper on the file system component of their storage systems: <a href="http://labs.google.com/papers/gfs.html" rel="nofollow">http://labs.google.com/papers/gfs.html</a> . They must have done some Linux development to get the storage systems so mature. And don&#8217;t forget about Android.</p>
<p>4. Google may be targeting netbooks, but look at the larger picture. It seems their long-term goal is really cloud computing. As you mention, Google will encourage and develop the cloud concept, but I think they have much bigger plans for cloud computing. And Netbooks are just a foot in the door&#8211;what better way to sell storing data off the computer than on a cheap and puny computer that holds non-professional data and is not designed to be a long-term computer.</p>
<p>Google has an amazing long-term vision and I have a feeling that Chrome OS is not an end in itself, but a vehicle to take their business models to the next level. Google holds a lot of cards it hasn&#8217;t revealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadguy</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>I agree with you for the future of MID, but Intel had independent plans for it, why would they be keen in chrome OS?
One of the reasons could be that both immature (google, Intel) Partnered for an OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you for the future of MID, but Intel had independent plans for it, why would they be keen in chrome OS?<br />
One of the reasons could be that both immature (google, Intel) Partnered for an OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>&gt; They also two big drawbacks: They are terrible and a lot of consumers regret buying them.

Tried to find &#039;netbooks terrible&#039; on google and haven&#039;t found anything except Apple ranting about netbooks, which, as in seems, are their direct competition on the market of coolnes.

I think netbook that you could carry in one hand anywhere around your house, that could boot up to browser in few seconds should be really nice thing to have. Especially if you could send the image to your 40+ inch lcd/plasma screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; They also two big drawbacks: They are terrible and a lot of consumers regret buying them.</p>
<p>Tried to find &#8216;netbooks terrible&#8217; on google and haven&#8217;t found anything except Apple ranting about netbooks, which, as in seems, are their direct competition on the market of coolnes.</p>
<p>I think netbook that you could carry in one hand anywhere around your house, that could boot up to browser in few seconds should be really nice thing to have. Especially if you could send the image to your 40+ inch lcd/plasma screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Run Google Android in VirtualBox, VMWare on Netbooks &#124; Taranfx: Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Run Google Android in VirtualBox, VMWare on Netbooks &#124; Taranfx: Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>[...] the announcement of Chrome OS, an operating system designed to be a browser and not much else. Maybe Chrome OS will fill a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the announcement of Chrome OS, an operating system designed to be a browser and not much else. Maybe Chrome OS will fill a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant &#124; Adobe Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant &#124; Adobe Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>[...] Chrome OS is now the hottest things over the internet.  Go here to see the original: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome OS is now the hottest things over the internet.  Go here to see the original: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac &#124; Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant &#124; Download Free Software</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac &#124; Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant &#124; Download Free Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2459</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Rele&amp;#118&amp;#97&amp;#110t and Irrelevant Nessun tag per questo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Rele&amp;#118&amp;#97&amp;#110t and Irrelevant Nessun tag per questo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/chrome-os-factsheet-why-its-relevant-and-irrelevant/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=1384#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>[...] See the rest here:  Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here:  Chrome OS Factsheet, Why its Relevant and Irrelevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.419 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-26 15:47:31 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
