<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome gets Native Code Execution with Native Client</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/</link>
	<description>iPhone, Android, mobile, Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Neal</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/#comment-21689</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-21689</guid>
		<description>Easier method to enable...

Type about:plugins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easier method to enable&#8230;</p>
<p>Type about:plugins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Win7user</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/#comment-13228</link>
		<dc:creator>Win7user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-13228</guid>
		<description>Unlike ActiveX, NaCl runs in a sandbox. Also there is an internal code analysis done prior to executing NaCl plugins to check for techniques that can be used to break out of the sandbox. Chrome and NaCl is a very positive development for Windows users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike ActiveX, NaCl runs in a sandbox. Also there is an internal code analysis done prior to executing NaCl plugins to check for techniques that can be used to break out of the sandbox. Chrome and NaCl is a very positive development for Windows users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modd</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>modd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>your bolg is not correctly displayed in the opera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your bolg is not correctly displayed in the opera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keeb</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>keeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>Yeah... unique like ActiveX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; unique like ActiveX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: website</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/#comment-5442</link>
		<dc:creator>website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5442</guid>
		<description>Man windows users are douchebags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man windows users are douchebags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gioymila</title>
		<link>http://geeknizer.com/google-chrome-native-client-code-x86-windows/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>gioymila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeknizer.com/blog/?p=2053#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>Microsoft allows to embed ActiveX components in Internet Explorer and frankly received over the years a lot of complaints (or worse) for security reasons.&lt;br&gt;What is the difference between Google&#039;s NaCl and Microsoft&#039;s ActiveX components running inside ie?&lt;br&gt;Why should Google&#039;s NaCl be safer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft allows to embed ActiveX components in Internet Explorer and frankly received over the years a lot of complaints (or worse) for security reasons.<br />What is the difference between Google&#39;s NaCl and Microsoft&#39;s ActiveX components running inside ie?<br />Why should Google&#39;s NaCl be safer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

